======================================== The story and future of England By Me Aug 26, 2019 ======================================== You know since a long time that we humans come from either a) the evolution of species b) creation. The former reply is the most "evolved" and agreed on today in modern day societies. While assuming we are but an evolved animal, like evolutionists write it, we become selfless "beasts" suitable to work in an organised business. On the other hand, to reckognise we are God's design, means we are born free willed and are not meant to be submitted by some alien authority, say, United Kingdom's crown. This makes the difference between slavery and the republic, hate and love, and, between fake and true religion. 1) The Evolution of man Right. So there once was a microbe that evolved to a larger animal and finally to many species of men. How long did that take us, indeed? 30 millions of years? Then, how could you still find bones yellowed from many millions of years ago when those I bury today cannot last a century? Hm. I guess they just disappear before some archelogist, devoid of principles, would try unearthing them. The older bones we put in museums are at most 200 years old. And they are maintained daily in a "good" environment so that they don't crumble to dust. Duh. The "species" we are informed about in books meanwhilst, are but inferior, crooked specimens of a widely acclaimed human prototype. We, in sum, could descend from a primitive animal: the barbarian from Gaul. However, such a creature was obviously less competent, pound for pound, than the modern man. It was an accident after all that made Neanderthaleans evolve to the Cro-Magnon species and scealed the fate of mankind: another, indigenous humanoid species of England, which was in summary mischievous, bald headed, and Gollum-like, was stuck on its miserable homeground - a foggy swamp without clean access to the sky. To write the truth, never was there possibly any sunrise in England before year 1550, and so it is obscurity and night all the time. Indigenous "sub men" from London must have lived a terribly sad life before modern humans took over. However, many miles away from here, on the coasts of Gaul, lived a bulkier species of man. It was the inventor of early technologies, including: the barrel, the wheel, the chariot. The armor, also, was forged by Gaulic proto humans, and also metallic weapons, like maces, bastard swords and spears. You can attest that by looking back at the history of Gaul and France, and its artifacts. The first tool ever created in Gaul was likely to be the wood slicer, so we could make baskets and hats from tree bark lanes and ropes from long trunk shreds. Mettalurgy came later on. The trigger, we could also name "green light" to primitive technology in Gaul, was a next to miraculous cross of Brit and Gallic human species - the christian cross and others could then signify such an unlikely wedding. Even though some history books state it like the truth, Romans just couldn't build galleons without today's heavy industry, including electrically propelled sawmills. Thus, the conquest of Britain by Caesar is a lie. There were no such industries in Rome. "Galleon" in itself is a gallic word, not a Roman one. So, what might have happened in reality is: the inhabitants of England (which are located the closest to Gaul on the entire Great-Britain territory) found a way to cross the water gap isolating them from Gaul, and crossed with the Gallics to form Cro Magnons and the first technologies known to mankind. This is purely linear. 1) Some female living on the shores of Gaul slept with a fish for she had missed her date. The replacement was of course not what she truely wanted. 2) Months went by and then was born a parody of her still missing mate - the fish man, who swam cluelessly to England and here met its disgracious indigenous species. 3) The fish man slept with English imps, also unsatisfied and complaining, and got children from some - sirens, which were manipulative, cunning and bitchy. Through oral tradition, that new generation of humans learned about a better life in Gaul and went back onto its shores. It then met the Gaulic human species and in turn crossed with it. However, due to its natural inclination to brooding and more fragile built, and lower life condition, the fish men and fish women wanted to settle their injustices and fabled a contract to develop technologies with the proud help of more comptetent Gallics. Then the former order and pacts with nature were breached: we cut down trees, slain animals and such, using foundries through the use of coal harvested on the lands of England, and brought there by the fish men (most likely in large floating baskets filled with coal chunks). Thus "progress" in Europe must have come from a handicap when we compared two human species - one born in the water, and the next on the ground. The Brit fish men were likelier quick at swimming, yet less capable on the land. So baskets could be brought to life by the Gallics as primitive baby boats, for unwanted children, and to toss them on the river, next to food supplies, in hope some other woman will pick it up. Moses in the Bible was such a case of bastard child, and there likely were many simmilar cases in Gaul and England due to the frailty and deceptive attributes of fish men when we compared them to home land species. The fish men that stayed next to England were meanwhile less lively and even thinner when compared to those in Gaul. That led to the first inferiority complex (and male castration complex), plus complaints, requiring referees and advisors. Envy, arguments, and wars followed. The poor fish man would dream of his dad on earth, and feel desperate in the cold sea. When the dad was a fish man and the mom a Gallic woman, on the other hand, the child would dream of his mom. Cain in the Bible is such a character, being "his mom's", not "his father's", and getting so much disrespect he'd kill his younger brother. So here, likewise, would be a metaphor of what really happened to the much deceptively introverted and lexically deficient imps and Brit sirens - the true story ain't that of Jews or Creation, but rather, England's. That would have happened 12 000 years ago. Whatever was known before such a time is the ice age and a tranquil life. Just looking at the remaining artifacts writes the story for you. And so it seems the very first Bible was not written by Jews. Instead, it would, by English men. King James' was composed in the first days of automated printing and paper production. How would it be otherwise, when we know we cannot print on paper massive amounts of books without it... The anglican church from the days of Henry VIII, and even from the days Gaul was invaded, when it was not named, would then be that of compromise, and the most ancient church on earth, for no law was required, and no excuse, when the Brits lived exclusively on their own land. It would seem inadequate, then, that we did cut down trees for so long and yet have found so little proof of book production before year 1750 (which came around 270 years ago), next to little evidence of forest razings. God's creation would not have endured I guess, such a mistreatment for so long. The anglican church, not the catholic one, made widepsread printing of books a reality, and later of magazines and catalogs. Each story that's written, thus, is likely to come from England, and not another country... for paper industry came from that very ground first. Writing itself needed a purpose like bad communication, deceitful neighboring, gloom, brooding, and widely spread social disorganisation to be invented (we wanted to hold long term proofs for whatever pact or peace treaty we toss at our enemies). Thus the inventors of latin would be *Brits*, not Romans. And "latin" thus cometh from "late", like, "holding in time" (writing stands through time when compared to gestures and sights). Finally it was not before Brits populated Egypt and submitted the area (Pharaos) that hyeroglyphic writing appeared. "Imperial" would precisely come from "imp" as in "English inhabitant". Wherever England reaches shore, empires are born. England is the enemy, and not a very hateable enemy at that. I believe God took care of us in choosing for our arch rivals, in Canada and Europe, such wimpy, crooked, yet comprehensive creatures. Not before we understand that, we might defeat the oppressor and repel the British invasion from every country on earth. THE END.